I think that the Internet is going to be one of the major forces for reducing the role of government. The one thing that's missing, but that will soon be developed, is a reliable e-cash - a method whereby on the Internet you can transfer funds from A to B without A knowing B or B knowing A.

The only relevant test of the validity of a hypothesis is comparison of prediction with experience.

The black market was a way of getting around government controls. It was a way of enabling the free market to work. It was a way of opening up, enabling people.

The most important ways in which I think the Internet will affect the big issue is that it will make it more difficult for government to collect taxes.

History suggests that Capitalism is a necessary condition for political freedom.

Columbus did not seek a new route to the Indies in response to a majority directive.

History suggests that capitalism is a necessary condition for political freedom. Clearly it is not a sufficient condition.

When government - in pursuit of good intentions - tries to rearrange the economy, legislate morality, or help special interests, the cost come in inefficiency, lack of motivation, and loss of freedom. Government should be a referee, not an active player.

One man's opportunism is another man's statesmanship.

If you put the federal government in charge of the Sahara Desert, in 5 years there'd be a shortage of sand.

The problem of social organization is how to set up an arrangement under which greed will do the least harm, capitalism is that kind of a system.

And what does reward virtue? You think the communist commissar rewards virtue? You think a Hitler rewards virtue? You think, excuse me, if you'll pardon me, American presidents reward virtue? Do they choose their appointees on the basis of the virtue of the people appointed or on the basis of their political clout?

The most important single central fact about a free market is that no exchange takes place unless both parties benefit.

I am favor of cutting taxes under any circumstances and for any excuse, for any reason, whenever it's possible.

Every friend of freedom must be as revolted as I am by the prospect of turning the United States into an armed camp, by the vision of jails filled with casual drug users and of an army of enforcers empowered to invade the liberty of citizens on slight evidence.

Governments never learn. Only people learn.

The price works so well so efficiently that we are not aware of it most of the time.

The Great Depression, like most other periods of severe unemployment, was produced by government mismanagement rather than by any inherent instability of the private economy.

The only way that has ever been discovered to have a lot of people cooperate together voluntarily is through the free market. And that's why it's so essential to preserving individual freedom.

Well first of all, tell me, is there some society you know of that doesn't run on greed? You think Russia doesn't run on greed? You think China doesn't run on greed? What is greed?

The government solution to a problem is usually as bad as the problem.

Universities exist to transmit knowledge and understanding of ideas and values to students not to provide entertainment for spectators or employment for athletes.

There's no such thing as a free lunch.

Congress can raise taxes because it can persuade a sizable fraction of.

Inflation is the one form of taxation that can be imposed without legislation.

Many people want the government to protect the consumer. A much more urgent problem is to protect the consumer from the government.

Most economic fallacies derive from the tendency to assume that there is a fixed pie, that one party can gain only at the expense of another.

Inflation is taxation without legislation.

Indeed, a major source of objection to a free economy is precisely that it... gives people what they want instead of what a particular group thinks they ought to want. Underlying most arguments against the free market is a lack of belief in freedom itself.

Is it really true that political self-interest is nobler somehow than economic self-interest?

A society that puts equality before freedom will get neither. A society that puts freedom before equality will get a high degree of both.

A major source of objection to a free economy is precisely that group thinks they ought to want. Underlying most arguments against the free market is a lack of belief in freedom itself.

The world runs on individuals pursuing their self interests. The great achievements of civilization have not come from government bureaus. Einstein didn't construct his theory under order from a, from a bureaucrat. Henry Ford didn't revolutionize the automobile industry that way.

Underlying most arguments against the free market is a lack of belief in freedom itself.

Most of the energy of political work is devoted to correcting the effects of mismanagement of government.

The power to do good is also the power to do harm.

So that the record of history is absolutely crystal clear. That there is no alternative way, so far discovered, of improving the lot of the ordinary people that can hold a candle to the productive activities that are unleashed by a free enterprise system.

I'm in favor of legalizing drugs. According to my values system, if people want to kill themselves, they have every right to do so. Most of the harm that comes from drugs is because they are illegal.

He moves fastest who moves alone.

Hell hath no fury like a bureaucrat scorned.

Government has three primary functions. It should provide for military defense of the nation. It should enforce contracts between individuals. It should protect citizens from crimes against themselves or their property.

Concentrated power is not rendered harmless by the good intentions of those who create it.

We have a system that increasingly taxes work and subsidizes nonwork.

Nothing is so permanent as a temporary government program.

Only government can take perfectly good paper, cover it with perfectly good ink and make the combination worthless.

The greatest advances of civilization, whether in architecture or painting, in science and literature, in industry or agriculture, have never come from centralized government.